We use maps every day – for navigation, education, news, and exploring our world. They are powerful tools that shape our understanding of geography, distances, and the relative sizes of continents and countries.
But have you ever stopped to think about how that curved, spherical Earth is represented on a flat piece of paper or a digital screen? This fundamental challenge introduces an unavoidable concept: distortion.
Representing a three-dimensional sphere in two dimensions is mathematically impossible without stretching, squishing, or tearing some part of the surface. This is where map projections come in.
Map projections are systematic transformations of the Earth's surface onto a flat plane. They are the essential bridge between the globe and the flat map, and understanding them is key to interpreting maps accurately and critically.
In this authoritative guide, we will delve deep into the world of map projections. We'll explore why they are necessary, the types of distortion they introduce, the main families of projections, and examine some of the most famous and widely used examples.
By the end of this post, you will have a robust understanding of this critical cartographic concept, empowering you to choose the right map for a specific purpose and appreciate the complex art and science behind the maps that shape our view of the world.
Imagine trying to peel an orange and flatten the peel perfectly onto a table without tearing or stretching it. You quickly realize it's impossible.
The peel will inevitably crack and you'll have gaps, or you'll have to stretch and distort parts of it to lie flat. The Earth, like an orange, is roughly a sphere (more accurately, an oblate spheroid, slightly bulging at the equator).
Its surface is curved in two dimensions simultaneously. A flat surface, like a map, is only curved in zero dimensions (it's flat).
There is no way, using only geometry, to transform the surface of a sphere into a plane while maintaining all the original properties of size, shape, distance, and direction simultaneously across the entire surface.
This is the core problem that cartographers face. Every flat map you see is a compromise, a purposeful distortion created by a specific map projection.
Since a perfect flat map is impossible, every projection must sacrifice the accuracy of some spatial properties to preserve others, or attempt to balance multiple properties imperfectly.
Understanding which properties are distorted and which are preserved is crucial for using a map correctly and avoiding misinterpretations.
There are four main types of distortion that cartographers consider:
1. Area (Equivalence): A projection preserves area if the relative sizes of features on the map are the same as their relative sizes on the globe. For example, if Africa is truly 14 times larger than Greenland, it should appear 14 times larger on an equal-area map.
2. Shape (Conformality): A projection preserves shape if angles are preserved locally. This means that the shapes of small areas are rendered correctly on the map, and lines of latitude and longitude intersect at right angles just as they do on the globe (though they might not appear as straight lines). Conformal maps are useful for navigation and showing local details.
3. Distance (Equidistance): A projection preserves distance if scales are consistent, meaning distances measured from a certain point or along certain lines are accurate. No map can be equidistant from *all* points to *all* other points simultaneously, but some projections maintain true distances from one or two specific points, or along specific lines (like meridians).
4. Direction (Azimuth): A projection preserves direction if angles from a central point or along certain lines (like great circles) are true. Azimuthal projections centered on a point typically preserve direction from that central point.
A critical takeaway is that a projection cannot be both truly conformal (preserving shape) and truly equal-area (preserving area) across the entire globe. These properties are mutually exclusive on a global scale.
Most projections are designed to preserve one or perhaps two of these properties perfectly, or they are "compromise" projections that attempt to minimize distortion across the board without preserving any single property perfectly.
Map projections are typically classified based on the type of geometric surface they conceptually project the globe onto before 'unrolling' it into a plane. While many projections are created mathematically without a physical model, this geometric classification helps visualize how distortion patterns emerge.
The three main families are cylindrical, conic, and azimuthal (or planar) projections.
Imagine wrapping a cylinder of paper around the globe, usually tangent to the equator or secant (cutting through) at two parallels. Then, project points from the globe's center (or some other point) onto the cylinder's surface. Finally, unroll the cylinder into a flat rectangle.
Cylindrical projections often result in a rectangular map with straight meridians and parallels that intersect at right angles.
They are typically good for representing areas near the equator.
However, distortion tends to increase dramatically towards the poles, often stretching polar regions infinitely (as seen in the classic Mercator projection).
Variants include tangential (cylinder touches the equator) and secant (cylinder cuts through at two standard parallels) forms, as well as transverse (cylinder axis is along a meridian) and oblique (cylinder axis is at an angle) orientations.
For conic projections, imagine placing a cone over the globe, usually tangent at a single parallel (a standard parallel) or secant at two parallels. Project points from the globe onto the cone's surface and then unroll the cone into a flat shape resembling a slice of pie (or an ellipse segment).
Conic projections typically show parallels as concentric arcs and meridians as straight lines radiating from the apex of the cone.
They are excellent for mapping mid-latitude regions or continents that extend primarily east-west, like the United States or Australia.
Distortion is generally minimal along the standard parallel(s) and increases as you move away from them.
Azimuthal projections involve projecting the globe directly onto a flat plane. This plane can be tangent to the globe at a single point (often the North or South Pole, or a point on the equator) or secant (cutting through the globe).
These projections are often circular, with parallels appearing as concentric circles around the central point and meridians radiating outwards as straight lines.
They are useful for showing polar regions or for situations where true direction from a central point is important (e.g., airline routes from a hub city).
Distortion increases as you move away from the central point of the projection.
Beyond the geometric family, projections can also be classified by the property they preserve (e.g., Equal-Area, Conformal, Equidistant, True Direction) or by their mathematical construction (which might not correspond directly to a simple geometric model, like many compromise projections).
Understanding these classifications helps predict the type and pattern of distortion you will see on a map using a particular projection.
Now let's look at some specific, well-known map projections and understand their characteristics, strengths, weaknesses, and common uses.
Arguably the most famous, and often criticized, map projection is the Mercator projection, created by Gerardus Mercator in 1569.
It is a cylindrical, conformal projection. This means it preserves angles and shapes *locally*, making it invaluable for navigation because lines of constant compass bearing (rhumb lines) appear as straight lines.
However, to achieve conformality, the Mercator projection drastically distorts areas, especially at higher latitudes. Landmasses and oceans appear increasingly stretched the further they are from the equator.
Greenland, which is about the size of Algeria or Saudi Arabia, appears larger than all of South America (South America is actually over 8 times larger than Greenland).
Alaska appears larger than Brazil (Brazil is over 5 times larger).
This severe area distortion has led to criticisms that the Mercator projection gives a misleading view of the relative importance or size of countries in the Northern Hemisphere compared to those nearer the equator.
Despite its area distortion, its preservation of angles makes it a standard for navigational charts and, in a slightly different form (Web Mercator), is widely used in online mapping services like Google Maps and OpenStreetMap for displaying local areas where conformality is beneficial and the distortion is less noticeable at zoomed-in scales.
Developed by James Gall in the 1850s and later popularized by Arno Peters in the 1970s, the Gall-Peters projection is a cylindrical, equal-area (equivalent) projection.
Its primary goal is to accurately represent the relative sizes of landmasses and oceans.
On a Gall-Peters map, areas are correct – Africa and South America regain their visual dominance relative to Europe and North America.
However, achieving equal area comes at the cost of severe shape distortion, particularly at higher latitudes. Landmasses appear stretched vertically near the poles and squashed horizontally near the equator.
This projection gained prominence in the late 20th century, promoted by those who felt the prevalent Mercator projection fostered a Eurocentric view of the world due to its visual exaggeration of northern countries.
While achieving its goal of accurate relative area representation, the shape distortion is often visually jarring to those accustomed to other projections.
Created by Arthur H. Robinson in 1963, the Robinson projection is a compromise projection. It is pseudo-cylindrical, meaning it has straight parallels but meridians are curved lines.
The Robinson projection does not preserve any property perfectly (it is neither equal-area nor strictly conformal, nor equidistant or true direction).
Instead, it was designed to look 'right' to the eye, minimizing overall distortion in a visually appealing way across the globe.
Shape and area distortions are relatively low within about 45 degrees of the central meridian and the equator, but they increase towards the edges and poles.
The poles are shown as lines rather than points.
For many years, the Robinson projection was the standard for world maps published by the National Geographic Society due to its aesthetic balance and reasonable representation of the world for general reference use.
Developed by Oswald Winkel in 1921, the Winkel Tripel (meaning "triple") is another compromise pseudo-cylindrical projection. It is named "triple" because Winkel sought to minimize three types of distortion: area, direction, and distance.
Mathematically, it is a mean of two other projections (the Winkel I and the Mollweide projections).
The Winkel Tripel is also a compromise projection, not strictly preserving area, shape, distance, or direction globally.
However, independent studies and evaluations have shown that it achieves a very low overall distortion compared to many other world map projections.
Parallels are slightly curved arcs, and meridians are curved (except the central one).
Recognizing its favorable balance of minimizing multiple distortion types, the National Geographic Society adopted the Winkel Tripel as their standard world map projection in 1998, replacing the Robinson.
It is widely regarded as one of the best projections for general world reference maps.
Designed by Karl Mollweide in 1805, the Mollweide projection is a pseudo-cylindrical, equal-area (equivalent) projection.
It is often presented as an ellipse, though it can also be shown as a rectangle by interrupting the oceans.
Parallels are straight horizontal lines, but meridians are curved arcs (except the central meridian).
Like the Gall-Peters, the Mollweide preserves the relative areas of landmasses and oceans accurately across the entire map.
Shape distortion is present, particularly towards the edges and poles, but it is often considered less severe or visually jarring than the Gall-Peters projection, especially in its elliptical form.
The Mollweide is frequently used for world maps that show global distributions of phenomena where maintaining correct relative area is important, such as population density, climate zones, or resource distribution.
The Albers Equal-Area Conic projection is a conic projection developed by Heinrich Christian Albers in 1805. As its name indicates, it is an equal-area projection.
It is typically used for mapping regions in the mid-latitudes that are wider east-west than they are north-south, making it particularly well-suited for mapping countries like the United States.
The projection uses two standard parallels (parallels where the cone cuts through the globe, and distortion is minimal). By placing these standard parallels strategically, distortion can be significantly reduced within the region of interest.
Area is perfectly preserved across the entire map.
Shape distortion increases away from the standard parallels.
The Albers Equal-Area Conic projection is commonly used for thematic maps of the United States and other similar regions where accurate representation of area is important (e.g., for showing data like population per square mile).
Another conic projection, the Lambert Conformal Conic projection, was developed by Johann Heinrich Lambert in 1772. Unlike Albers, this projection is conformal.
It preserves shapes and angles locally, making it excellent for navigation and surveying in mid-latitude regions.
Like the Albers, it is also typically based on one or two standard parallels.
Distortion of area and distance increases away from the standard parallels.
The Lambert Conformal Conic is widely used for aeronautical charts (where accurate angles for headings are crucial), topographic maps, and mapping countries or regions primarily in the mid-latitudes, such as the United States and many European countries.
The Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection is an azimuthal projection developed by Johann Heinrich Lambert in 1772. It is an equal-area projection centered on a single point.
It preserves the relative areas of regions across the map, regardless of their location.
It is typically used to map continents, hemispheres, or polar regions where maintaining correct area proportions is important, especially when showing data distributions centered around a point.
Distortion of shape and distance increases significantly away from the central point.
For instance, a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection centered on the North Pole is often used for maps of the Arctic, showing the landmasses and oceans around the pole with correct relative sizes.
Given the variety of projections and the inherent distortions, how does one choose the "best" map projection?
The answer is: there is no single "best" projection for everything. The most appropriate projection depends entirely on the map's purpose and the geographic area it covers.
Here are key factors to consider when selecting or evaluating a map projection:
1. What property is most important for the map's use? If you need to measure distances or areas accurately, you need an equidistant or equal-area projection, respectively. If you need to navigate by compass or show shapes precisely, a conformal projection is necessary. If none are paramount, a compromise projection might be best.
2. What geographic area is being mapped? World maps often use compromise or global-focused projections. Maps of continents or countries might use conic projections for mid-latitudes or specific projections tailored to the area's shape and extent. Polar maps require azimuthal projections centered on a pole.
3. What is the map's intended audience and message? A map showing population density globally requires an equal-area projection to accurately represent the distribution. A map for airline pilots needs to be conformal or true-direction. A map intended for general education might prioritize visual balance with a compromise projection.
For navigation at sea or in the air, conformal projections (like Mercator or Lambert Conformal Conic) are preferred because they preserve angles and shapes locally, allowing for accurate plotting of courses.
For statistical or thematic maps showing the distribution of phenomena (like population, land use, or climate zones), equal-area projections (like Gall-Peters, Mollweide, or Albers Equal-Area Conic) are essential to ensure that densities and totals are represented accurately across different regions.
For general reference world maps in atlases or classrooms, compromise projections (like Robinson or Winkel Tripel) are popular because they attempt to offer a visually balanced representation of the entire globe, minimizing the perception of distortion even if no single property is perfectly preserved.
Understanding the map's purpose is the first step in determining which projection is most suitable or in evaluating whether the projection used in a map you encounter is appropriate for the information it presents.
The reality of cartography is that distortion is an unavoidable consequence of representing our spherical Earth on a flat surface. Every map projection is a choice about how to distort the world.
While this might seem like a limitation, it is also a powerful tool. By choosing a specific projection, a cartographer can highlight certain aspects of geography while downplaying others, tailoring the map precisely to its intended use.
The advent of digital mapping and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) has not eliminated the need to understand projections; in fact, it has made it even more critical.
Digital maps use projections (often Web Mercator for interactive panning and zooming, though systems can convert between many others), and choosing the correct projection is vital for accurate spatial analysis and data overlay.
Interactive maps can sometimes give the *illusion* of reduced distortion as you zoom in, because distortion is minimal over very small areas on most projections. However, the underlying global projection still governs how distant areas relate to each other.
Understanding map projections means becoming a more critical and informed map reader. It means recognizing that the way the world looks on a map is a product of specific mathematical decisions, not just a neutral depiction of reality.
It encourages us to ask questions: What property is this map trying to preserve? What properties are likely distorted? Is this the best projection for the data being shown or the story being told?
Map projections are not just technical curiosities; they are fundamental to how we perceive and interact with global geography through flat maps. They are the elegant mathematical solutions to the impossible task of flattening a sphere.
We have seen that every projection involves trade-offs, prioritizing certain spatial properties like area or shape at the expense of others.
From the navigationally useful but area-distorting Mercator to the equal-area but shape-distorting Gall-Peters, and the carefully balanced compromise of the Winkel Tripel, each projection offers a different view of our planet.
There is no single perfect map projection. The "best" map depends entirely on its purpose.
By understanding map projections, we gain a deeper appreciation for the complex choices cartographers make and the inherent limitations of flat maps. We become better equipped to interpret the geographic information presented to us, recognizing that every map is a carefully constructed representation, a piece of cartographic art and science shaped by mathematical rules and human intent.
So the next time you look at a map, take a moment to consider the projection. Think about what it shows accurately and what it distorts. This simple act will transform your understanding of the world it portrays.
```
TestPlayNA: Your Memories, Elevated: National Park & Ski Maps.